Quote:
|
Originally Posted by thebatsman
Normally with no Ace showing I would raise here and everybody knows you got Kings.
|
Ugh. That's not a great idea considering that nobody will care if you have kings, which is the impression I got from the table's description. A fold's the way to go against idiots.
A fold can be the way to go against good players too, since "everybody knows you got kings" is a real liability. If you stay high and he makes something that beats kings you'll eat a raise on the expensive streets. If you don't stay high he'll have something scary showing to back up his bet.
You'd be much better off playing it in better position. Random other thoughts:
Quote:
|
With so many lo cards out already it's tougher to make lo with many players.
|
True, but that's a blessing and a curse. It also increases the odds someone's playing a pair (because two high cards plus a baby would've folded) which means concealed trips or two small pair are real possibilities if someone plays back later.
Quote:
|
Plus your stack is healthy it might be time to put some pressure on
|
It might be, but probably not here. You'd need to play a big pot in a tough situation. It'd be entirely different if you were closer to the bring-in with fewer low cards behind you. Plus, at a table full of aggressive people overplaying hands it's ridiculous to think you can steal many antes. Save you chips for pots where you have great value against a couple of guys.
Quote:
|
Considering you're at the FT, you only want to get involved in a stud hand that has scoop potential, or you're just throwing chips away.
|
With the exception of when you have a good one-way hand in favorable positions. I won a huge half pot in a high/low tournament with a similar hand. The key difference being I had KKK while the rest of the table had babies and ended up taking half of a 4/5 handed pot. I've also made nice half-pot grabs with shitty low draws in position against people who'll draw to either two lows card or the second bet low. (ie, A26 against a K,8,7) In both cases your equity in a huge pot compensates you for losing some scoop potential.
Quote:
|
WTF is the idiot with the 4s doing? What a stupid goddamn motherfucker. This is the worst play ever.
|
I'm not that willing to lay into him. 844 is an ok starting hand and he's on a pretty short stack. His fours would need to be dead for it to be the "worst play ever." :wink:
I think the problem is that his hand justifies seeing 4th and 5th but his stack doesn't. With fewer than four big bets he's going to the mat with anything he plays. I'd do that with 844 which has scoop potential, however shitty it is.