![]() |
|
|||||||
| Limit Hold'em Fixed limit hold'em strategy for all limits |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
School Fish
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 108
|
I've seen this a billion times at low to medium limits and can't understand the logic behind it.
Say you have JQ and your wierd opponent has QT. You have position on your opponent and you raised him when he open limped. Flop: 9s Tc 3d Your opponent bets into you with his TP+TK You reraise. He calls. Turn: 2d Opponent checks You bet Opponent calls River: 2c Opponent bets out into you??? Someone explain the logic behind this play to me... |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Whale Hunter
|
flush and straight draws missed, he has TP
very unlikely you have a 2 you often have nothing (A high)
__________________
Attempting to blog at Carrera's Felt Poker blog (updated 16-5) |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
School Fish
|
Yeah which side were you questioning?
QJ raises the flop to pump the pot and/or get a fold. Now he's got better odds to call a bet on a missed turn. The bet on the turn by QJ must now be a bluff to induce a fold, though I personally wouldn't do it unless I had a great image at the table or a good read, as villains always 'put you on AK' as a miss here. For the QT side, he has to call PF which such a powerful hand. The final river bet out was as Carrera says plus see above 'put you on AK' comment or the obvious draw. I still would say it's not the best of plays by QT...better to check/call with a weak hand. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
School Fish
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 108
|
I must of saw that play 20 times last night in the span of two hours when i was multitabling.
I see it as -EV. If you're beat and the guy has you crushed he's going to reraise you on the river and you lose two bets assuming you call. If you bet and he's been on a draw he's folding and you gained nothing. I just dont see betting out being profitable in the long run unless you have TP+TK or two pair against a loose passive player. Any decent opponent your better off checking and inducing a bluff imo. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Whale Hunter
|
a 9 will pay you off a lot here in limit.
__________________
Attempting to blog at Carrera's Felt Poker blog (updated 16-5) |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pot Limit Omaha Poker: The Big Play Strategy | sevens | Book Club | 2 | 05-01-2008 05:54 PM |
| Pot Limit vs No Limit | Snickers99 | Small Stakes No Limit Hold'em | 8 | 12-22-2007 06:27 PM |
| Limit vs No Limit | caffiend | General Poker Discussion | 31 | 11-22-2007 08:22 AM |
| Time Limit On Live Play | Snickers99 | Trip Reports | 10 | 10-24-2007 12:47 PM |
| Done with limit...at least FR | Velar | Limit Hold'em | 3 | 07-15-2007 10:40 AM |