So I sit down at 2 FR 1/2 limit tables.

Table 1 -- get dealt lots of good hands, in a short span, and lose.
Table 2 -- play none, except the following.

PokerStars 1/2 Hold'em (10 handed)

Preflop: Hero is Button with :Jh:, :Td:.
UTG calls, 2 folds, MP1 calls, MP2 calls, MP3 calls, 1 fold, Hero calls, SB completes, BB checks.

Flop: (7 SB) :Tc:, :3c:, :8s: (7 players)
SB bets, BB calls, UTG calls, MP1 calls, MP2 calls, MP3 raises, Hero folds, SB 3-bets, BB calls, UTG calls, MP1 folds, MP2 folds, MP3 calls.

Turn: (10.50 BB) :6d: (4 players)
SB bets, BB raises, UTG folds, MP3 calls, SB 3-bets, BB caps, MP3 calls, SB calls.

River: (22.50 BB) :Ts: (3 players)
SB bets $1 (All-In), BB raises, MP3 folds.

Final Pot: 24 BB

Results:
SB has 6h 8c (two pair, tens and eights).
BB has 9s 7c (straight, ten high).
Outcome: BB wins 24 BB.

Look at the PF and Flop!!! I even said 'wtf...limit at it's best' in the chat. Some guy complained that he *had* to drop his 66 on the flop...boo hoo, I'm surprised you knew to fold.

But seriously, you need flopped quads to stay in with this kind of action and I'm just not that patient. Bad table choice, but this just doesn't happen as much on 6-max, in my experience. So it's back to that or NL for me.

__________________
"Let me tell you how the internet screwed up poker. On the internet, when a guy sucks out on the river, you can't take him out back and break his fuckin' knees." - Deuce Fairbanks

Seven players on the flop? That's my kind of table!

Seriously though, that looks to be like a great choice of tables to me. You'd really rather have draws to the nuts than flopped quads though, it's a bit easier to get paid off. I will agree that it can be boring as hell if you're used to playing a lot of hands though, you can only really play speculative hands in position.

I typically fold any JTo, JQo, JKo, QKo, if I am not on the button or if there is a limper already and 3-4 still to act....

I will play them when suited

Yes!!! :nod: